Merchant Cash Advances (MCA) have become an increasingly popular financing option for small and medium-sized businesses in the UK, but there are MCA Regulations in the UK especially for those that may struggle to secure traditional loans. While MCA can offer a lifeline to businesses needing quick access to capital, the regulation of these financial products remains a topic of growing importance. In this article, we will explore what MCAs are, the current regulatory landscape in the UK, and how businesses can navigate the complexities of using MCAs while ensuring they are protected by applicable rules.
What is a Merchant Cash Advance (MCA)?
A Merchant Cash Advance is a type of alternative financing that allows businesses to receive a lump sum of cash in exchange for a percentage of their future debit or credit card sales. Unlike traditional loans, an MCA is not based on a fixed repayment schedule. Instead, repayment is tied to the business’s daily or weekly revenue from card transactions, making it a more flexible option for businesses with fluctuating cash flow.
MCA providers generally work with industries such as retail, hospitality, and service businesses where card transactions make up a significant portion of the revenue. The funding is quick, often within 24 to 48 hours, and does not require the same level of scrutiny as a traditional loan.
For an in depth dive into Merchant Cash Advance, we created this article to help you understand it better.
The Current Regulations on MCA in the UK
Merchant Cash Advances fall into a somewhat grey area in UK financial regulation because they are not classified as traditional loans. As such, they do not come under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which regulates most credit products in the UK, including personal loans and credit cards. This leaves MCA providers largely unregulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the main regulatory body for financial services in the UK.
However, while MCAs are not directly regulated, MCA providers are subject to certain obligations:
- Unfair Contract Terms Act: Like any business-to-business agreement, MCA contracts must comply with the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. This means that the terms must be transparent, and there should be no hidden fees or misleading clauses.
- Data Protection Regulations: MCA providers must also comply with data protection regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This ensures that businesses’ and customers’ data is handled responsibly and securely.
Voluntary Codes of Practice: Although MCAs are not strictly regulated, many providers follow voluntary industry codes of conduct. These codes encourage transparency, fair pricing, and responsible lending practices. Some MCA providers are also members of trade associations, such as the Alternative Business Finance Association (ABFA), which promotes responsible and ethical behavior in the alternative finance industry.
Examples of Regulatory Gaps and Concerns
Despite these basic regulatory obligations, the lack of comprehensive regulation around MCAs raises some concerns, particularly for businesses that may not fully understand the terms they are agreeing to. Unlike regulated credit products, MCA providers are not required to:
- Conduct affordability checks: In a regulated loan, lenders must assess whether the borrower can afford the loan. MCA providers, however, are not required to do this.
- Provide APR comparisons: MCA providers are not obligated to display an APR (Annual Percentage Rate) or give businesses a clear sense of the total cost of borrowing, which can make it difficult for businesses to compare offers.
For example, a small restaurant might take out a Merchant Cash Advance of £10,000, agreeing to repay it at a factor rate of 1.3. This means they will ultimately repay £13,000 by giving the MCA provider a portion of their daily card sales. Since there is no defined loan period, and repayments fluctuate based on sales, it can be challenging for the business to evaluate the true cost of the MCA or compare it with other types of financing.
Possible Changes to MCA Regulation
As the popularity of Merchant Cash Advances continues to grow in the UK, there is increasing pressure for more stringent regulations to protect businesses from unclear terms, high costs, and potentially predatory practices. Although MCAs currently fall into a grey area of financial regulation, proposed changes could bring them more in line with other credit products, enhancing transparency and fairness. Below are some of the key regulatory changes that could improve the MCA landscape.
1. Clear Disclosure Requirements
One of the primary concerns surrounding Merchant Cash Advances is the lack of clarity regarding the total cost of borrowing. MCAs are typically structured with a factor rate (for example, 1.3 or 1.4), meaning that a business repays more than the amount they receive in the advance. However, since the repayment is tied to the business’s future sales, it can be difficult for borrowers to understand the true cost of the advance, particularly when compared to more traditional loans that clearly outline an APR (Annual Percentage Rate).
Clear disclosure requirements would standardize how MCA providers present the costs of their products. By requiring providers to express the total cost of borrowing in terms of an APR equivalent, businesses would have a better sense of what they are agreeing to. This would also allow them to make more accurate comparisons between different MCA offers and other forms of financing, such as traditional business loans or lines of credit.
For example, instead of a factor rate, MCA providers might be required to show the cost of the advance as a percentage of the amount borrowed over a year, much like an APR, giving businesses a clear sense of the interest they are effectively paying. This would prevent businesses from being surprised by hidden costs or confusing terms.
2. Affordability Checks
Another potential regulation would be the introduction of affordability checks for MCA providers. Unlike traditional lenders, MCA providers are not currently required to assess whether the business applying for an advance can realistically afford to repay it. In some cases, businesses might accept an MCA without a full understanding of how much of their future cash flow will go toward repayment, which could lead to financial strain.
Implementing affordability checks would require MCA providers to review the business’s financial health before approving an advance. This would involve analyzing the business’s historical revenue, cash flow, and profitability to determine whether they can handle the repayment terms based on their expected sales volume. Similar to how traditional lenders assess a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, these checks would prevent businesses from taking on debt that could ultimately jeopardize their operations.
For instance, a restaurant with fluctuating sales might not fully anticipate how much of their future revenue would be allocated to repay the advance, particularly during slow periods. With affordability checks, MCA providers would help ensure that the business is capable of sustaining repayments without overextending itself financially, thus avoiding potential defaults.
3. Stronger Consumer Protections
MCAs are currently not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the same way that traditional business loans are. This lack of oversight creates a regulatory gap where businesses are not entitled to the same protections they would receive when taking out other types of credit. Strengthening consumer protections for MCA recipients would involve introducing more comprehensive regulatory oversight and applying similar standards that govern other financial products.
These stronger consumer protections could include:
- Standardized contracts: Ensuring that MCA contracts are standardized and clearly outline all terms and conditions, including potential fees and penalties.
- Right to appeal: Introducing a formal process for businesses to appeal or dispute unfair terms or actions taken by MCA providers, similar to the protections provided under the Consumer Credit Act for personal credit products.
- Caps on fees and charges: Implementing caps on fees, charges, or penalties associated with MCAs to prevent businesses from being overwhelmed by excessive costs that might not have been clear at the time of agreement.
With stronger consumer protections in place, MCA recipients would have more recourse if they encountered unethical practices, excessive fees, or unclear contract terms. This would create a more level playing field between MCA providers and businesses, ensuring that the latter are not taken advantage of due to a lack of transparency or regulation.
Conclusion
Merchant Cash Advances have become a popular financing option in the UK, especially for businesses that need fast access to capital and may not qualify for traditional loans. However, the lack of clear regulation around MCAs can leave businesses vulnerable to hidden costs and unfavorable terms. While providers are subject to some basic obligations, such as data protection and fair contract terms, there is a growing call for more comprehensive regulation to protect businesses.
For businesses considering an MCA, it is crucial to thoroughly review the terms of any agreement, compare offers where possible, and ensure that they understand the total cost of borrowing. As MCAs continue to grow in popularity, greater regulatory oversight may be introduced to create a more transparent and fair marketplace, benefiting both businesses and the alternative finance industry as a whole.
At ticktockcredit.co.uk, we offer the most transparent, no fine print terms! You will be aware of what the charges are and more importantly – how much everything is going to cost you.
Feel free to leave your details here for a free consultation.